>>275947828
>Blame yourselves if none of you are still able to abuse what is still an outrageously overpowered gun. Literally get good and stop bitching.

I thought you were arguing for the nerf, but then you say this and it sounds like you're arguing against it. If none of us are able to abuse it, then it doesn't need to be nerfed. You don't nerf things based on a theoretical where everyone has mastered the gun. 

The revolver nerf was and continues to be fucking dumb. As >>275947856 mentions, it gives the stomped team a chance. It is worse than a rifle. Getting dicked on and having to hard eco isn't fun or interesting. It just makes the snowballing even worse. If you really want to punish the losing team, it's enough that they have to use a non-rifle (against a team of rifles).

Feel free to respond but I say the same shit every time this comes up. If a gun is not a problem, where problem=dominates the meta, then don't nerf it. The revolver doesn't change playstyle whatsoever so it's not like a knife or something that can feel shitty to die to. The reasons for nerfing are nonsense. If the gun is OP, then it will dominate the meta, and then you can balance the _meta_. If it is not dominating the meta, there is no inbalance, and thus the nerf will not help restore balance because it was balanced to begin with. Getting worked up on how retarded the nerf supporters are.