>>345241817
That's a really cute argument but it falls afoul of the strawman fallacy because I only went as far as to say get some kind of discernable talent, not be of such superlative skill that you're of historical importance. What I suggested was on level with saying you should learn to play piano, rather than your strawman that I suggested you become a famous composer.

I do, in fact, have talent. I know how to make things, in the physical domain as well as virtual. I'm reasonably good at carpentry, I know how to use CNC equipment. I can design and construct objects, devices, tools, and even simple structures. I can write software well enough to satisfy my own hobby projects and I can share that joy of exploring a hobby with others, too. These are all things you also can learn to do and have something to your person other than drinking and half-baked lukewarm takes. But you don't.

Anon complains that half the time when they ask anon about his interests, he only says "I don't know, video games dude." Think about that.