>>274924325
Uh you don't need to counter non existent evidence. So you're saying you don't even have evidence now, so the counter evidence isn't real... Either way this disproves your claim "his ex said this".
[spoiler]There's no jury when deciding wether or not there's even a case to make beyond circumstantial evidence to begin with, so you'd present NOTHING to a judge and he'd call you a fucking idiot[/spoiler]