>>275333675
>Valve has a history of introducing shit that ruins video games (always online DRM, microtransactions about cosmetics, p2w games, paid modding, held back VR as much as it pushes it forwards)
>but it's okay, they're not Facebook, and they like games just like me so they must be based, who cares they sell an overpriced piece of shit unlike their competitors
Meanwhile Oculus at least puts money in VR games development and Valve... sent a better version of their own controllers to some faggots that continued to shill them for a year? Announced a single game that raises a lot of red-flags already?