>>345243289
that you love to hoard knowledge and value it above conventional traditional methods?
>>345243458
but is that talent of artisan something unique to you, do you stand above those without it metaphorically?
when everyone is "special" no one is, unless you are a "famous composer" are you not just a dime in a dozen artisan?
if i have acknowledged my limitations due to a lack of inherent talent am i not more long sighted than you
do you not see the irony of elevating mediocrity to be outstanding then dialing it back when actual talent comes to the equation?