>>389086031
>Do you not lock your doors just because someone can smash your window?
This whole analogy doesn't work digitally. It's more like not locking your doors because the only lock you can ever have is made of paper anyway and costs a lot of money. Imagine spending millions on anti-piracy software as a company, only for people to trivially download ripper tools anyway. That's how this works. 

>At the end of the day there are ways to uniquely identify an asset.
No, there absolutely isn't if you can rip things. That defeats the purpose. 

>>389086536
Well you've realised the issue so I've got nothing to add. Virtual goods can't be unique with how trivial they are to rip and modify.

>>389086428
See the reply above, you're naïve.