>>266309820
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as rape, is in fact, sex-consent, or as I've recently taken to calling it, sex minus consent. Consent is not a sexual experience unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning rape system made useful by the sex corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full rape as defined by POSIX.

Many rapists run a modified version of the sex system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of sex which is widely used today is often called "rape", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the sex system, developed by the rape project.

There really is sex, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Sex is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's consent to the garbage. The kernel is an essential part of a sexual experience, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete rape. Sex is normally used in combination with the rape operating system: the whole system is basically sex with consent removed, or sex-consent. All the so-called "rape" distributions are really distributions of sex-consent.