>>405027749
>At most a 1.3x average improvement in GPU, but not CPU, so no benefits to CPU bound games.
Regardless of what trash like vrchat made you believe, CPU performance is not a real problem for VR.
You have no idea how fast modern CPU's actually are. Something like 5950x should chew and spit workload of vrchat proportions without even noticing it. The thing that we are somehow struggling to maintain solid 120fps is nothing but embarrassment. 
But it doesn't matter how extra GPU performance you can get, we would always need more. 

>There are already reports coming out that BTFO this notion.
Paid report by meta heh? QP is not worth buying, maybe something will change in 6 month, but for now it's the truth. 

>>405028407
lol