>>331637169
>stand to lose the most
how can you stand to lose anything if there is no wager in the game? that makes zero damn sense unless you expect you're going to get laid with some internet damsel in distress being harassed by incels
>>331637247
every game that has chat option can be considered a social game if you wring it hard enough, have you considered that maybe not all men are some desperate sweaties that lust after your lovely lady lumps just because they heard you sound like you inhaled helium?