>>389093962
Then you seem to have a brain in that box on your neck at least.

The biggest problem with blockchain and NFT, aside from the ridiculous energy consumption required by proof of work systems, is that people expected the wrong things from it. NFT Bros crying that their monkeys got ripped were fucking retards for thinking that what they were buying was a monkey picture.

Anyone who thinks an asset can't be cryptographically encoded/signed/identified just doesn't know shit about cryptography. 

Even putting that aside, if I have a model, generate an SHA-256 hash of that asset, put that 256 hash into an accept blockchain ledger, it doesn't matter if you download my asset, make a minor change and reupload it under your own name. Being a derivative would be obvious to anyone in the same circles (but let's be honest, no one wants my assets, they're garbage.) Proof that you had original ownership is just "Here's my asset, it's SHA-256, and my entry on the blockchain with it's timestamp."

Anyways, I don't have a point.