>>323768718
>>323769821
Even if they are worthy of their power then, what for later? Secret plots and conspiracies do actually happen from time to time, just not in the way of ayylmaos and flat earths. Your entire concept of a peaceful anarchist collective is at best fragile and metastable. Who culls, and by what means? Do people delegate this culling? What stops a group from reinventing police, for instance? Not even out of a need to be governed, but simply to specialize and spend time working on their greatest competencies. Your description of a mob that rules itself by a collective that rejects that which it considers abhorrent fails to consider that people like to bifurcate. Suppose the case of some sandniggers in our post-state utopia throw a gay man off a roof, and some yuros hear about this and raise a grievance about it. The sand people insist that it was righteous and the yuros refuse to yield. Suddenly, we have two camps of people that are structuring to oppose one another. The first major disagreement would forever split the collective. Much like how your anarchist collective relies on the unified tension of all its members existing in accordance to the consent of all others in it, explicit and implied, there's a structure that also relies on the unified tension of all its members to maintain its shape.

It's called a bubble.