>>410036873
>AMD can't do this
>Nvidia can do this
>no I will not show source
Those are your claims. I just wanna read for myself where you dug that up. But it seems like the place you dug it up from was assumption from a PR slide from AMD.

>If you're not even going to try to claim that anything I'm saying is incorrect why should I play google slave for you?
Retard. You made your claim without pointing out any source whatsoever. No, a PR slide from some press event is not enough. And even if I'd be polite enough to say it is, the other 50% you claim (Nvidia being able to do that) is missing.
You know this as well, that is why you are pissing around instead of just pointing me to the source.
If it is so easy, then just show me both the AMD and the Nvidia spec sheet.