>>386420807
It won't. That's the goal for future devices, while current ones are just stepping stones to get there. Boz probably was trying to hold things back because he knew the device couldn't quite achieve what they wished it could compared to what Apple's going to release.

>>386420841
"Significantly" more expensive than $800 was not a joke. Though this probably will at least be significantly cheaper than Apple's (lol). 
Not a lot of info on Deckard yet but if it's Apple level, don't expect it to be as cheap as $1000 again.