>>306351962
Sucks for the poorfags, though. I don't want visibility to be gated by how much money you are able and willing to spend.

>>306352625
>It wouldn't work because it would have to be heavily moderated. Anyone could just make a horrendously disorienting and loud affect and spend $10 to ruin everyone elses good time.
The pool of people willing to pay would be small in the first place, making moderation of just that subsection easier.
People who abuse it can then have their prvilege be revoked or be banned - though a company is rather unwilling to sanction paying customers, unless they realize it's in their own long-term interest.

>Why the fuck is it allowed for someone to have an animation that starts flipping my field of view in circles and zooming in and out?
Because you can make neat things with it if you don't abuse that power. You wouldn't be able to do these neat things if they blanket-disallowed that and similar shader shenanigans.