>>329551757
Yes, as you can see in my screenshot I'm already inching up on 70k, at good. I shouldn't have to clarify, but I'm not advocating people make their avatars good; its not a sane thing to do, but for most avatars poor or even medium are easily within reach.
A problem with selectively showing very poor avatars is that it bypasses safety settings.
>>329551920
It's low if you're trying to toggle between multiple wardrobes. But realistically the difference in tangible performance between 50k and 100k should be minimal.