>>368495263
>who asked?
the two posts I've mentionned, since they are arguing about population in /vrg/ and /vrlg/ threads, it's better in my opinion to compare numbers on the latest threads from both rather than the current ongoing threads
>>368495494
it doesn't, because IPs counts production is less reliable as vrlg threads dies faster and would be higher because of that (just included it because more data is always funnier). What we'd need to effectively compare the two is the amount of overlapping posters accross successive vrlg threads, which is probably at least 50%