>>403133934
Yeah, you're probably right.
I wouldn't mind S being the creator of the vrg group, they seem to know a lot of people, they're an oldfag, likeable, they don't get into drama
BUT
We probably shouldn't call it "/vrg/" and we should not make group instances. It should just be a side thing that can maybe help us find other vrg folks. Locking instances to the group is bad for newfags or people who are out of the loop