>>322049841
No, it's called blatant harassment that you've been doing for years, he proved it pretty solidly, he uploads his work anonymously to this thread, infinite praise, as soon as he's identified you guys shit on it. 

It's a classic case of confirmation bias, and bullying, stop being mean
>>322049901
No, it doesn't. If it looks like dogshit, why did people have to hack the account attached to it to make it cloneable