>>292352903
You sound like you care way too much about what an individual in the thread says about you - both by letting your behaviour be dictated by the vocal shitposters, and by not adressing the legitimate implicit argument in >>292350426 (despite it's tone).

But I do like the idea of differentiating between "event" and "theme" (>>292351528). 
We could reserve the term "event" for something that happens over a short period of time, e.g. "RealCannedFluna dance party between 18:00 and 21:00 on Wednesday the 2nd of September UTC+0",
and "theme" for something that happens over a whole month, e.g. "Slimegirl September".

People might quickly get tired of themes that way, though, and themes might conflict with events in terms of scheduling, because by making something a "theme" you are basically claiming a whole month. It might actually not even be possible to have scheduled "themes" because too few people might participate, seeing as the only successful month-long things we've done are few and really demanded lots of people to be excited, like during the first Cyber Punk March. Dunno whether it would really be a good idea to differentiate them like that.

>>292355597
Different words communicate different things differently well and can especially avoid ambiguity.