>>401173462
>Nvidia has enough legitimate reasons to be hated, there is no point creating fake issues.
3.5 was a "fake issue", gaming benchmarks is a "fake issue", what are some real issues that the gamers which don't include myself at that time were aware of?
>Oh the dunning-kruger in this one is almost suffocating.
My bad, i just assumed nvidia's ceo had any idea what he's talking about, it seems very weird that according to you even he is vastly underestimating the power of the fully operational 4090™.
Can you explain for the laymen among us how he is wrong?
I've made a thread on /g/ just for the fun of it, i'm sure they'll explain to me how i'm wrong and nvidia are great and you''ll get double the performance.
>>88778040
Must be an amd employee that replied first, ignore that.