>>324557953
im not really worried about it literally blowing up but i wouldnt expect it to be durable and, short of always having a spare around, things not breaking is more than just a monetary concern
>>324557537
>having to choose between framerate and fov
too much stuff like this makes me think that the overall quality just isnt there
i mean, i dont really know anything about monitors and whatnot but having to choose if i want a high framerate or a wider fov, even in years time when pc hardware might be able to handle both, doesnt sit well