>>323715331
Because it's only good for simracing, but racing games are already more GPU demanding, and it gets even worse with the G2 resolution. I have to run AC at 30% SS for SRP with a 6900xt, and I'm still not getting consistent 90 fps. What's the point of the nice displays when no GPU out there can manage the resolution requirement? An index would have had more FOV, and I could have used the higher refresh rate for less demanding games, not to mention that the tracking is better if I want to play normal VR games. It probably doesn't get as hot too. Look at pic related. They did benchmarks comparing it to the vive pro, and it cuts the FPS almost in half. And that's with a 3090. Why does the G2 even exist? Yeah I can play the 2-3 decent VR games at 100% SS, but so what? The tracking isn't even that good, it's not wireless or anything. What's the point of a G2? This is so depressing...