>>346003620
It's not that I didn't read it, it's just that the standard of evidence needs to be pretty high to me to be banned for another 4 years from the meetups.
Some random anyonymous discord screenshot just doesn't cut it enough to me, considering how easy it is to fake them, ESPECIALLY considering that we've recently had the case of anon calling D underaged when he's not.

If you can find convincing, strong evidence that proves that he's underaged, I'm totally for kicking him, though.