>>410068647
You're probably going to regret being such a prude when all the people you reported move to ChilloutVR and all that's left are the screaming children on Quest headsets. Or is that your goal all along, Mr. Groomer?

>>410068868
It's not explicit, though. Explicit would be exposed breasts/genitals and/or sexual activity. At best it would be considered "suggestive". If panty shots are considered sexually explicit then all Victoria's Secret ads/catalogs should be labelled as pornography.