>>274597067
>Is Quest the ideal for me then?

I cannot answer that, I'm trying to be honest with you but for clarity I own a Quest myself and it is therefore hard not to be biased. Really pay attention to all your options and pick the one that is correct for you. It does seem like a Quest will get you up and running the fastest right now, and possibly the cheapest as well, plus leave you options in the future regards PC upgrades but hear from someone else first too.

The Link update makes your PC see the Quest as a Rift S, with full SteamVR/OpenVR compatibility. There isn't a single game/application/whatever that real PCVR can do that the Link can't do.

>>274597163
This is true and worth paying attention to! The Quest only runs its display at 72hz, though the hardware panel itself is made for 90hz, Oculus doesn't run it at that because it wasn't certified for use at that as a finished product. There is some minor whispers that there will be mods which allow Link 90hz capability but as of now that means NOTHING, and will mean nothing until it happens. Assume it to always be 72hz for now. 
I am trying to be fair.