>>351062435
Anonymity has never been a requirement for posting on 4chan, merely the default option. Old 4chan had way more namefags and tripfags around than we see today, and this anon isn't even namefagging. You're just calling out someone you recognize from elsewhere by their interests and posting style, which is unavoidable in a consistent, circumscribed community like this. They're only not anonymous to you; I have no clue who either of you are beyond your contributions to this particular thread.