>>297770080
>>297770812
We could easily make a better version of the powerglove today. I don't think anyone doubts that. What we doubt, and for good reason, is that we could make a cheap enough, say <$200 glove that 1. is comfortable and fits everyone, and 2. that tracks the fingers with sub-mm accuracy and unnoticeable latency. The fact that there aren't any gloves like that, despite many startups attempting to do it for the last 10+ years, demonstrates that the sensors do not exist at such price points, and that if you think they do, then you are mistaken. And beyond that, in order to allow flexibility in hand size while keeping tracking accuracy, the glove would need to be a lot more complicated to engineer and manufacture, if it's possible in the first place. We don't want you to put on the glove and see a virtual hand that's too big and bends less precisely.