>>383434782
Places like that and userbenchmark are full of complete shit and don't tell the whole story, they're bad places to look at. Those numbers are also vastly inflated by CPUs which are over a decade old. 

If you spend 200-350 on the 9700k, you can save another 200-250ish, maybe even less depending on the board, to buy a new motherboard and get even a mid range 12th gen CPU, or current Ryzen 5000 series, that will completely and utterly shit on the 9700k in every possible way by such a degree it's not even a fair comparison, and will last you so much longer.