>>405025298
>>405025101
Yeah, Vive wasn't perfect either and Touch was fine. But I'm just talking about how the overall community and public viewed the devices. Opinion was overwhelmingly negative. Still remained that way, but much less so after Touch launch and people began seeing how it was actually a pretty good headset and could actually be cheap, after the price drop. 

Now with Quest Pro, people are thinking that it's basically a slightly better Quest 2 but shitty because it's $1500. But they haven't seen the potential of the cameras that can come from software improvements, they haven't seen the difference eye tracking and face tracking can make in apps as both input methods and for social VR, they haven't even realized how much of a difference the contrast and colors make for immersion, as if Pico 4's resolution bump makes it better than Quest Pro.