>>310235743
I've always heard this 'wireless adds latency' meme, but I don't see why it would. The speed difference of electromagnetic waves traveling through 3m of air compared to copper cable definitely isn't 30ms of difference. I could see the compression overhead being ~30ms though, which is important because >>310235620
 existing wifi 5ghz standards can only do 1-2Gbps, not the 20Gbps that can do. the 60Ghz band wireless radios (like the HTC wireless adapter) can do 4-5Gbps data rate, but still require some compression to fit video data through there.