>>337494216
I think the thrust of trans activism within both of our lifetimes has been entirely against forcing someone to live as a gender other than the one they identify as, i.e. the opposite of Money's case. Money seems to have been trying to prove that gender is a malleable concept and that there is no innate internal sense of it, which if true would undermine trans identity as it is thought of today.
No one is arguing that it's a good idea to forcibly mutilate kids and make them take hormones and live as their opposite gender against their will.