>>307663901
They have NSFW options for their avatars and a pretty decent following. 
I'm doubting that'd work in my case. 

>>307664043
Yeah but so many public avatars are just....terrible. Either they're bad on purpose to be a meme or a joke or something. Or they're typical e-thots or wolf-boys or something with random straps, chains, and tons of glowing shaders on them. 

When I asked for an ETA I was told, "A few days maybe?" \
But then they also mentioned, "If it takes more than a week and I don't msg you, just hit me up. I easily forget stuff"

I like their work but man...I've never had something custom made for me and am way too excited and impatient wanting to see progress pics and updates...