>>410069314
>It's not explicit, though
cumrot
>If panty shots are considered sexually explicit then all Victoria's Secret ads/catalogs should be labelled as pornography.
they show the underwear from the front, side, and back at a dead on angle or from above-never below. this thumbnail is a sexualized pose with detail to show lips. even victoria's secret knows to smooth out lip lines or not show them at all. you chose this image from your cumbank and your brain is so swiss cheesed that you can't remember the "if you wouldn't show your mom, it's probably innapropriate" rule. cope