>>412144601
I'm not defending him I'm just insulting you for not being able to put in arguments that makes sense. Screenshot in this post is something to condamn him for, but is unrelated to being a pedo if he did not do it with a minor.
Your screenshot in >>412144306 does not do him any disfavour
By spamming bad arguments you are doing yourself a disservice to your cause, if you want to frame someone do it right at least