>>420170162
A lot of the points are wrong, as someone who came from there. Also, /slg/ is a bad mark anyways since what anyone wears there nowadays is the equivalent of our TDAs. The things that are wrong
>f2p
about right
>ability to props
Right but actually kind of annoying to set up there
>desktop only
They've been trying forever. Looks like they might get VR support but only for IK/movement.
>First person
They call it mouselook, and it's pretty jank, but yes
>no collision
There is, and it's just capsule collision. You can stand on people, and it's fun. There's scripts that take advantage of it for this reason.
>No DPS
Their system they use just relies on animations on the sex furniture they use (since furniture controls the animators) automagically adjusting the transparency of different parts of the dick, usually. Lots of things are scripted to handle it in some fashion, but it's pretty clumsy. Nice part is you don't need to do it from POV and all, but it really is just porn. Quite expensive porn, too. A good sex couch will cost you around 20USD, not counting the land needed to plop the thing down.
>shaders
That absolutely doesn't exist there. Anything alike to a shader is done by normals fuckery and the only people pushing the bounds in that direction anymore seem to be the ponyfags. Everyone else just decided it was best to just look like Gal-o-sengen and call it a day. 

It's worth noting that SL has scripted lovense support that, supposedly, is better and more responsive than what people on VRC get. I'm not likely to believe it since a lot of the way their servers are set up means it's still probably slow as balls, or worse. Then again these people pay money for buttplugs AND the scripts to run them, so YMMV.