>>367747096
If the hashes of images are the same it is implied that the images themselves are the same, which is why 4chan uses this kind of filter in the first place. So no, my statement is not wrong, it just doesn't account for the no-so-likely possibility of two different images having the same hash
>inb4 hurr durr md5 bad and compared to muh sha collisions are highly probable!!
I have 13 more images that are very similar to the 3 posted, you want them?