>>361622853
>>361623001
I'd argue they're wrong by virtue of the root word reck clearly being the root word Wreck with the W being lost to time because what was wreck ever wreck instead of reck in the first place?
Silent letters are fucking stupid

Wreck = reck therefor wreckless or reckless is fine, with reckless being the modern rendition of wreckless to get rid of silent letter memes