>>350969272
kinda reminds me of a Ponzi scheme
>valve sends the broken controller to customer #12
>customer #12 doesn't RMA and keeps broken controller
>valve sends another broken controller to customer #34
>customer #34 RMAs
>valve sends the exact same controller to customer #35
>customer #35 rma's
>valve sends the exact same controller to customer #36
>customer #36 doesn't RMA and keeps the broken controller
This scheme would be sustainable as long as enough customers keep their broken controllers.