>>338674754
I'm not very poor but hypothetically they would be and I can think of performant avatars that are unfairly rated as well as shitty ones that are rated good.
>>338674819
>they could have a weighted combined score
Yeah, that's the most immediately obvious very simple solution they just haven't implemented for who knows why.
Making something to properly benchmark them would be difficult but changing to a scoring system over just whatever is the worst would be easy and a lot better. Plus, theres no reason to cap the score so TDAs could have a performance ranking of 3000 whereas someone just into very poor might be 205.