>>279687945
>Imagine if the people running those servers and events could have their own thread
I don't mind taking up a few posts in a thread, but I don't think anything I do is worth a thread on it's own, and, ideally, you wouldn't need those kinds of threads anyways. A VR board existing should mean there's already enough interest in VR that it shouldn't just be a bunch of dead games with no playerbases.
>AC general
Wouldn't exist on a VR board. There's not enough VR specific stuff to talk about, and there's already /ovg/ on /o/ for simracing discussion.
>many of those games see 5k plus active vr users daily/weekly
Like what? Pavlov consistently peaks below 2k, and VRChat is full of desktoppers?