>>323584134
the guy has played vrchat so he is clearly interested in the game and virtual reality, the guy does not want to pay the 400 usd price tag to enjoy it fully, i gave the guy options on something cheaper than 400 usd because to some people throwing away 400 on a whim is silly, maybe if he would try the hardware in some test place (during corona? no way!) he would know if it is a worth it investment for his entertainment, i had to pretty much assume it is worth it i purchased my cv-1 with very low expectations so i wouldn't be disappointed but i was luckily positively surprised with the level of immersion it gave me and the addition of having hands was nice
>>323584274
the topic is supposed to be focused on vr and vr games specifically, most of the time some people just stray from topic and get slapped on the wrists for doing that