>>331803402
I think you are mixing me up with another anon, since I never talked about "deserving through virtue". Or maybe I formulated it in such a way that it seems like I want content makers to just get money by uploading anything.
What I had in mind was something akin to patreon (>>331802825
), where you give money to content makers on a regular basis except that the subscribers wouldn't get any "rewards", or a tip-jar/donation system where you give them a lump sum once. 

The important part to me is that there is no tangible benefit to the subscriber/donor, so that no one is locked out but content makers would still get money for making good things.