>>416289601
>we should stop gatekeeping because it makes people feel bad and they might act out
Lol no, fuck off. Gatekeeping has worked for years.
It's 4chan, get the slightest bit of a spine and a tiny first-time interrogation won't bother you. The biggest pushback I get from kicking randos is always from people who have massive thread melties or people who only considered this place a stepping stool for themselves. Your suggestion is to capitulate to randos, who are often quest users, underaged, furries, or report-happy trannies who will get you banned for saying bad words.
They are a liability in so many ways, and they must be kept out. Right now, the best solution to that is trying to see if someone browses 4chan and kicking them if they don't.
>>416290126
>What about people who want to hang out with non-4chan people from time to time?
Totally fine... in a non-vrg instance. But if you're the sort who gets A LOT of non-vrg friends or orbiters joining on you, consider going on orange status.
>>416290509
This is such backwards logic. "Um actually pushback against randos creates more randos, so we should just stop pushing back and let them all in and maybe it won't be quite as bad"