>>336296330
>There was a clear implication there that it would go further than just casual sex and then they pulled back.
Yeah, this is a very good way to put this, rather than paragaphs I've written to describe what happened I wish I could've asked
>What do I do when we clearly implied we'd go beyond casual sex and one of us is pulling back?
>>336296476
>which is still a bad idea if you don't want to see it succeed and mean it earnestly.
Yeah I don't know why I even typed it out, should've realised how dumb it was in my head.