>>272754691
drones can take out dozens of towelheads with no risk of retaliation, don't have any way to incriminate their employers and, once again, don't talk about it if they ever grow old enough for retirement
once we get androids capable of matching human speed, bouncers and mercenaries will be out of a job unless they learn to code lol
>>272754642
>that guy who steals teammates' ammo and uses it to rig indoor sections to explode, burying both teams
>>272754764
I agree with the AI as a service part but even that can be quite dangerous for its owners
if we're talking porn sims, what will most likely happen is that an AI will be given a task of creating a set of algorithms and then export them as a standalone app with no capabilities of an AI itself, just taking user input to pick the most appropriate subprogram for the situation in a way one would scroll through a row of fetishes
that is more than enough to satisfy their customers with DLC to spare (watersports etc wink wink)
maybe that's what you meant in the first place but I just wanted to make that distinction