>>278136330
Okay? But didn't we get VR precisely because we wanted more depth features like that?
>Oh I'm glad he didn't go all the way for some reason
>>278136993
Are you serious? The spaceships in Elite: Dangerous don't even have the pilot using motion controls. The game allows you to use HOTAS and then it's basically 1:1 control responding to what's happening on screen. No VR shooters allows for this level of immersion.
If you reduce VR FPS aiming to pointing controllers, you're getting a glorified gun-con game, which is severely underselling what the tech is capable of.