>>403325305
Games for standalone are obviously less impressive visually, but they still work pretty well. Though I prefer to just use my pc because buying games on a store tied to facebook is a bit cringe

>>403325446
resolution of q2/pico4 is better than index, pico4 has way better resolution but lower refresh rate (90hz vs 120hz), q2 has 120hz.
Q2 has trash FOV, apparently Pico4 has good FOV but still a bit less than index
Tracking is good for both q2/pico4 but not using base stations means you'll have to add that to the cost if you ever want to get fullbody tracking
Audio is way better on index than on q2, apparently pico4 is fine but we'll need reviews from someone who's not a pico shill
Both q2/pico4 allows to use pcvr wireless, but they don't have a video cable connection so you cannot play with an uncompressed image on PC (apparently barely noticeable on pico4 with virtual desktop according to pico shill but will see once it releases)
Index is a lot more fragile in general, most people using an index had to rma either the cable or the controllers

Hope it'll help.