>>265401347
Go for it my dude sounds rad. Set up some sort of template or keyword that we have to use as a format. That's how the >>265404031 scraper works.
I'd be definitely using it at least. You can always roll a test for a bit to see if it's going to get abused but honestly doubt as that would require an effort post. Just checking for duplicates is probably going to be enough. 

For format I'd suggest requiring a keyword for each section i.e.
Event: (title etc)
Time: (some standard format you could parse to a local timezone, probably UTC)
Details: (bits explaining join instructions etc)
Also could have it filter out anything that doesn't have an event image.