>>267834685
>>267832894
>>267830837
This makes sense. We’ll scramble something up to make this years gifting better for both receiver and gifter.

Your suggestion about having specific questions so that people can know what kind of character the target is is great. 

We’d like it to be fully 100% anonymous too but a system to facilitate it escapes us at the moment. If anyone has a suggestion on how it can be done in a virtual environment that’ll be great. Current system is as anonymous as it gets for the moment wherein only the santa knows who the target is but not vice versa.