>>352540280
>What makes you think this?
the complaint with the vrgrammys is that it wasn't inclusive: they just had an idea and made an event out of it all by themselves. the thread didn't get to nominate! the nominations were bad!
that's why the all-inclusive thread vrgrammys were planned, and their immediate decay into a steaming pile of shit made them morph into the sneedup.
so... they had an idea and made an event out of.
maybe you'll claim "oh, but the vrgrammys is a popularity contest, so the sneedup is better." but this wasn't a problem when they were trying to do the thread vrgrammys so it looks like a strategic pivot after a complete crash and burn.
besides which a comedy event that makes fun of the idea of popularity contests is better than the actual literal popularity contest that the thread was trying to do.

>>352540280
>>352540312
anyways, if the sneedup isn't a spite event and it's just an alternative for fomo, it would've been pretty easy to put that in the absolute first post about it, or to have it start an hour after the vrgrammys, or any number of other things that would've made it more friendly with the whole community. instead we got "oh yeah i'm going to the sneedup and anyone who goes to the vrgrammys is getting removed from my friends list and banned from any of my worlds and YOU SHOULD ALL DO THE SAME"