>>397586625
I think treating /vrg/ the same as any other general is a wrong approach, because the topic is far broader. 

This general is less comparable to something singularly focused like the Arknights General, or franchise-focused like Fire Emblem General,
it's more comparable to broader generals like /indie/, which is about niche indie games in general, or /civ4xg/, which is kinda like /vst/ but in prototypical general form, or /agdg/, or /vn/.

The /vrgg/ proponents would maybe disagree, though, claiming that /vrg/ is very VRChat-focused, which is true.

But I think the actual questions that matter aren't about whether the board would be fast enough, because there's plenty of good boards that are slower, they are about whether making a VR board would facilitate or hurt good discussion. Whether VR discussion has a place on 4chan (yes), whether VR discussion is already being served well by the existing structures (IMHO no), and what the costs would be to the other boards (negligible).

>>397587159
>/3/ has never made anything worthwhile.
/3/ made Gunt.
Gunt is lovely.