>>366652685
VRChat has a paid plus option and a lot of investment money.

Saying they should raise their kids doesn't make it happen. Making vrchat 18+, or splitting it into 18+ and G portals, would help. That simplifies things for everyone, allows mods to deal with minors on sight like 4chan does (and in the case of a split, limit adults who cause trouble to 18+), and makes it easy to put technological measures in the quest standalone version of the game. They can slap enough checks and parental control systems on the quest standalone version to remove a lot of the current exposure since most of the kids are in the walled garden.

>>366652814
>Trying to put burdens exclusively on parents is a bad thing now? Holy fuck you people are delusional.
t. pedo who knows parents have been failing to handle the burdens forever, and face an impossible task in this society, especially when they both have to work
>will never be *good enough* for the likes of MSNBC and Facebook, both of which have stakes in seeing VRChat get shut down.
They didn't shut down 4chan, and the facts that it bans minors and cooperates with the FBI are significant reasons why. Putting on enough of a show so they can say "we tried" helps a service keep control of itself.

Slippery slope is an argument that identifies a common cause, and it's valid when the common cause exists. We have two common causes here: kids are interacting with adults, and pedokikes like zucc are involved. The easiest countermeasure is to reduce interactions between kids and adults.