>>414101905
>>414101931
the same that you are.
That is why I'm asking if that is such a difficult concept. We can kick people on sight should we find out they are not a good fit. Yet everybody and their dog act like that once the initial "hazing" was done, for some reason newfags become untouchable.

>>414101974
>who clearly clash with 4chan culture, openly say they dislike the culture
then they should be kicked and take the time off to ask why they want to be a part of a community they don't like.

>But then you talk to them and it becomes increasingly obvious that they have browsed boards like /ck/, /v/, /a/, /g/, /vg/ and /tg/ for a very, very long time.
>browse
Yeah, kick them. They should have lurked more if they get all pissy about it.