>>418077616
>And no, the burden if proof isn't on me, I never said that "EU has more furries"
Then what is the point of contention? The original claim that sparked the discussion was just that. If you never said that and do not believe that, then I dont see why you spoke up (while the original guy mysteriously disappeared the same minute you started posting).

Stepping away from the original poster does not absolve the burden of proof when the initial claim stands as the source of the discussion. If you do not join the discussion to discuss the topic then you have no grounds to argue in the first place. As it stands, there has been some evidence for the side that NA has more than EU, but absolutely no evidence or even a whimsical claim or implication with a couple of name drops to imply the opposite.

In the absence of resistance to said claim, it should be obvious where the truth lies. At least until there is something that implies the contrary. We cant sit here all night showing you shit just because you dont like and will not accept what you are seeing, your personal opinion based on what seems to be nothing concrete what so ever is completely irrelevant in the context of this conversation.