>>271956494
>I like being affectionate to people and like receiving their affection
Nothing wrong with that.

>with no strings attached
There is the problem. I know it's a big leap but it's literally telling that you like having sex with people but with no strings attached. I'm not judging and you are completely free to do so as long as you are on the same wavelength as people you do it with, like >>271957487 said.

You have to understand that being intimate with someone is not the same as shaking hands or giving goodbye kisses. You are being intimate, you can't just be like that and expect people to just not care. i.e. "no strings attached"
Imagine having a cat, you pet your cat, you cuddle with your cat. All of a sudden, someone else comes and take complete control of the petting and hugging of your cat. This changes things to a way that now, you have to wait for your turn to pet the cat. In this case it's not a big deal but I hope you can see how it can makes people a little bit jealous.

Intimacy is not something that you can just share with the world like that, it's why it's called intimacy, and I'm not even talking about sexual intimacy here note the difference.