>>334017783
I don't think your understanding of the psychology behind this is correct. I'm pretty sure even Alexander the Great was submissive. The role of sexuality is not just reproduction, but also bonding. People evolved in small hunter-gatherer groups and homosexuality could have arisen in some groups because it facilitates male-male bonding and the act of homosexual sex itself would clearly establish dominant and subordinate roles. A group with members that have strong bonds and a well-regimented hierarchy would be more cohesive and therefore more effective in inter-group conflict. Homosexual behavior would need to have evolved through group selection, so the leadership among that group would pass on genes that are responsible for submissive homosexual behavior. Keep in mind that behavior is an expression of both environmental and genetic factors, which are intertwined.