>>327323159
>I don’t think I would position it as a Quest competitor
>declined to provide specs for the new device but did tease that it was better than HTC’s current products “from every perspective” and that “it’s probably better than what’s out there from any vendor today.”
That seems to me like they're trying to shoot for some kind of high end standalone headset while Quest goes for the casual market. Maybe it's enterprise only like the article is speculating, but I'd really like to see someone else at least try to compete with Facebook.
>>327325373
I don't see it being a comparable experience at any price since Quest already has a big library. If they can get a few big games ported in time for release, it might still have a chance though.