>>403140479
Also just another thought - I agree it shouldn't be called /vrg/ and should have some other vague name and I don't think people should display the group on their nameplates to prevent it from being spread to outsiders.

>>403140597
Yeah it would be nice for that so you can discover some other corners of the group you wouldn't normally join on or be aware of. For this to work though it'd have to be a unified group that people would want to join, I doubt everyone would agree with joining a group

>>403140705
I dont think so, newfags would still be able to join meets as they always have, a group would just add yet another way for them to join, not remove older options. Namedrops and instance links would still work