>>333576329
>the entire paradigm of being an anon has changed so much over the years to the point its not really something you can bond over with the younger anons.
Extremely important. Assuming you weren't too underageb& in 2006 anon >>333575595, you're going to have better luck with other older anons. A lot of them have done what the other guy said and have their own circles they hang with that will skew closer to your age.