>>280416225
>>280416434
I find the agency in elevating luck to winning (by bluffing) or conversely destroying good luck (by oversizing bets) more interesting than mahjong, where you can only affect your probabilities of win or loss so much through tile selection and counterplay. Not saying I don't like riichi mahjong too, but it feels more passieve overall, which is of course a positive or negative depending on what you personally like.